Saturday, January 25, 2020

The Fifth Element: A Critical Analysis

The Fifth Element: A Critical Analysis The Fifth Element is one of the best science fiction movies ever made. What is science fiction? Stories that often tell about science and technology of the future is considered a trademark of science fiction. Science fiction films are also known to include a human element and are often set in the future, in space, on a different world, or in a different universe or dimension altogether. They often will depict dangerous or sinister natures of knowledge and vital issues about the nature of mankind and our place in the whole scheme of things. Science fiction displays the possibility to destroy mankind with Armageddon-like events through technology as well. In the film, The Fifth Element, the Earth is threatened by an evil force every 5000 years. An alien race, the Mondoshawan, have created a weapon to defeat the evil force and safeguard it on Earth in Egypt. The Mondoshawan look like gigantic upright beetles with metal skin and tiny heads. The weapon is four sacred stones representing the elements of Earth, Fire, Water, and Wind with a fifth element that is used in combination with the stones. With the imminent arrival of World War I in 1914, they no longer feel the weapon is safe on Earth and come to take it away, promising to return when the evil force comes back during the course of the 5000-year cycle. In the year 2259, as the Mondoshawan are returning to bring the weapon back to Earth, their ship is shot down on the orders of an agent of the evil force, Jean-Baptiste Emmanuel Zorg. The Mondoshawan never fully trusted the human race and it was determined that the sacred stones were never on that ship, as it was a decoy. The Earths military was able to gather some cells from the wreckage of the ship, and by using the genetic makeup of those cells, reconstructed a life form. The life form, which is in the shape of a young female human, is the fifth element. Her name is Leeloo. She becomes frightened and escapes from the reconstruction chamber. She runs into Korben Dallas, a recently retired Commander of Earths military, and currently a New York City cab driver. Leeloos undertaking was to find the priest, Vito Cornelius, as he knows of the ancient ritual to set off the weapon against the evil force. President Lister was given this information regarding Cornelius earlier. President Lister recruits Dallas to go and retrieve the sacred stones from the Diva PlavaLaguna who is on another planet. Leeloo and Cornelius have their own plans. Dallas, Leeloo, and Cornelius travel to the other planet. Dallas retrieves the stones with the help of DJ Ruby Rhod. With help of Cornelius and Leeloo, the four of them beat Zorg at his own game for control of the sacred stones. They flee back to Egypt and with only minutes to spare, Korben tells Leeloo what she needs to hear and the love she feels enables her to destroy the evil force from annihilating Earth. The plot may be a standard one; good versus evil with a love story intertwined, but it is a good solid one. The film is based on a story by Luc Besson and he wrote it when he was sixteen years old. Roger Ebert agrees that the plot does sound like something conjured up by a teenager but still remains positive. In his review in the Chicago Sun-Times, he states, The Star Wars movies look deep, even philosophical, in comparison, but never mind: We are watching The Fifth Element not to think, but to be delighted (Ebert). This movie is exciting and catches your attention very quickly. The introduction of characters goes seamlessly from one to another. It does, however, have many stereotypes of what one might expect from a science fiction film. Mick LaSalle said in his review of the film in the San Francisco Chronicle, Its an amalgam of every science fiction clichà © about flying cars, evil forces and benevolent outer-space creatures most of them dusted off and made new (LaSalle). Many science fiction films show things in them that may be unbelievable. The beauty is that these things could happen. Flying cars? Sure, that might be possible some day. Aliens coming to destroy the planet? It could happen. The Fifth Element has all of these things. This movie creates a sense of wonder in the viewer. Not only is the viewer wondering what is going to happen next, like any other enjoyable film, the viewer will be anticipating what outrageous thing they are going to show you. In this world, you do believe it and it is true to the life portrayed in the film. This film is well told and the viewers will find themselves rooting for Leeloo, the fifth element. This is high-voltage excitement in a pop culture world. Its big on commercialism and there is a lot of product placement. The film is a bit predictable, by the end, evil is destroyed and the boy gets the girl. But the viewer will have a good journey to the end. The characters themselves are phenomenal. Bruce Willis plays Korben Dallas, the recently retired war hero who now drives a cab in New York City. Korben just cannot get a break. After being plagued with nightmares, he gets mugged on his way to work. He gets into an accident, where the viewer is first introduced to the beautiful Leeloo. Hes involved in a high-speed police chase and after returning home, he is notified that he has been fired. The military comes back into his life to send him on a dangerous mission. He travels with Leeloo to retrieve the sacred stones and must fight the ugly, killer-for-hire Mangalores. He must constantly put up with Ruby Rhod, an annoying DJ. After getting the stones and saving Leeloo from certain death, he must race against the evil force to set up the ancient weapon. In the end, he helps to save Earth and also gets the girl but his trials seem long and by the end, you are cheering that finally, something has gone his way. Leeloo is played by actress Milla Jovovich. Her role in all of this is that she is the fifth element. She tells Korben on their way to meet the Diva to get the sacred stones, Me fifth element supreme being. Me protect you (The Fifth Element). She has regenerated from cells alone to a perfect modelesque being that has flaming red hair with blonde roots. She learns the history of humans from a computer to bring her up to speed on Earths history. She can fight with the best of them, kicking the kung-fu out of some Mangalores. By the time they recover the stones and have made their way to Egypt to set the weapon in place, Leeloo is exhausted and is disillusioned as to why she must help the humans as she has seen the destruction they have done in history. She whimpers of not knowing love and does not realise that Korben has fallen in love with her. Korben must tell her how he really feels and kisses her with passion and she feels the love from him. She is able to make the ancient weapon work and defeats the evil force trying to demolish Earth by blasting it with white light derived from all that is pure and good. Priest Vito Cornelius, played by Ian Holm, is Leeloos contact on Earth. Cornelius takes this role very seriously. When Korben wins two tickets to Fhloston Paradise, his cover to retrieve the sacred stones from the Diva, Cornelius knocks Korben unconscious to steal the tickets for Leeloo and himself to go. When Korben shows up at the airport in time to make the flight, Cornelius stows aboard the plane in a maintenance compartment in order to reach Fhloston. He is a supporting character in this film but really is necessary for the story as he holds a plethora of knowledge that has been passed down to him from the last 5000 years. Under Korbens cover of winning the radio contest, he is bombarded by DJ Ruby Rhod, played fabulously by Chris Tucker. Ruby is simply a combination of Dennis Rodman and Pee-wee Herman, on crack. He speaks in a falsetto voice and gets irritated with Korben because his responses on air are not super green, his favourite catch phrase. Dressed flamboyantly in a leopard print body suit, he is all about using his popularity to his advantage with the ladies. He ends up with Korben in battle with the Mangalores and screams like a little girl every chance he gets. He also flies with Korben, Leeloo, and Cornelius to set up the weapon in the temple. Jean-Baptiste Emmanuel Zorg is the bad guy in all of this. Played by Gary Oldman, Zorg is an egotistical munitions dealer who is also the agent of the evil force that threatens Earth. He is relentless in pursuing the sacred stones, hiring the Mangalores to shoot down the Mandoshawan ship before it ever reaches Earth. He bullies Cornelius to try to give him the location of the stones. He puts a bomb on the pleasure cruiser to Fhloston Paradise which eventually kills him in the quest for the sacred stones. The makeup effects were not extraordinary by any measure but the visual effects in The Fifth Element are absolutely breath-taking. In the 23rd century, New York City is crammed full of people and the buildings seemingly shoot up from out of nowhere for miles. But the place they originate from is the garbage. As the author of The Fifth Element, Terry Bisson states, The deepening haze and smog that clung to the ground level of the city mercifully obscured the generations of litter and debris the urban midden that covered the streets to a depth of between twenty and forty feet (Bisson 78). The depth of the garbage problem is shown quite well. During the police chase scene, Korben and Leeloo hide the taxicab in the garbage down by the street level. Theres even a sign from an old company called IBM. In the airport scene, there is garbage piling up against all the walls due to a sanitation strike. It is heaped so high that it covers exits as a Mangalore jumped into a pile and escaped from police. The visual effects are model based as well as computer generated. The flying traffic depicted in this film is amazingly meticulous in detail. The cars are rounder at the edges and somewhat flatter than the cars of today. In the police chase scene, the details of flying the can in between cars, avoiding traffic jams, and even escaping through a train tunnel are wonderfully done. According to filmsite.org, the films most celebrated sequence was, the cab chase with flying cars (filmsite.org). Everything is brightly coloured and moves fast so the viewers attention is caught and remains focused on where the film is going. The costumes for most of the characters are all a little strange and what the film would portray as futuristic. Korben wears normal looking pants but his shirt is fluorescent orange with cut out strips in the back. Leeloos first outfit after regeneration is nothing more than strategically placed white surgical tape. Her second outfit of the film consists of gold pants and a white half-shirt which would look tame enough with the exception of the orange thong suspenders. DJ Ruby Rhods costumes are by far the best. He is originally dressed in a leopard print bodysuit with a huge flared collar with pointy brown boots. His microphone is covered in the same leopard material, the end lights up red when someone speaks into it, and it is about three feet long. His hair is a short blond afro with a cylinder of blond hair sticking out of his forehead. His second outfit is again a body suit; however, this time is completely black and wrapped around the flared collar is a wreath of red roses. The pants are flared out into bellbottoms and completely with black boots. The microphone is the same length but covered in black fabric with a silver tip. His hair is black this time and wrapped up in several little buns all over his head. Jean-Paul Gaultier was the costume designer and he was nominated for a Saturn award in 1998 in the category of Best Costumes (Internet Movie Database). This is absolutely one of the best science fiction movies ever made. The Fifth Element was nominated for an Oscar award in 1998 for Best Effects and Sound Effects Editing and also won a BAFTA award in the category of Best Special Effects (Internet Movie Database). It is a fantastic tale of good versus evil in the far away future. The viewer will enjoy the fabulous special effects and colourful characters as they root on the good guys in the destruction of evil.

Friday, January 17, 2020

Econ-545 Week 6 Quiz

| 1. | Question: | (TCO F) The size of the labor force in a community is 1,000, and 850 of these folks are gainfully employed. In this community, 50 people over the age of 16 do not have a job and are not looking for work. In addition, 80 people in the community are under the age of 16. The unemployment rate is ______. | | | Student Answer:|   | Unemployment rate=unemployed/labor force*100 150/1000*100=15% 1000-850=150 (number of people unemployed) then divided by total labor force divided by 100|   | Instructor Explanation:| The unemployment rate is calculated by dividing the number of unemployed by the labor force.The labor force is calculated by subtracting three things from the population (# under 16, # of institutionalized adults, and # not looking for work). In this example,  you are given the size of the labor force (1,000), and you are also told that 850 are employed. Therefore, 150 are unemployed, and the  unemployment rate is simply 150/1,000 or 15%. | | | | Points Received:| 15 of 15| | Comments:| | | | | | | 2. | Question: | (TCO F) Suppose  nominal GDP  in 2005 was $15 trillion, and in 2006 it was $16 trillion. The general price index in 2005 was 100, and in 2006 it was 103.Between 2005 and 2006,  real GDP  rose by what percent? | | | Student Answer:|   | Nominal GDP and REAL GDP must be equal in the base year. 2005 15tr, price index = 100 since nominal and real GDP must be equal in the base year 15tr/1. 03=16. 56tr(16. 56-16. 00)/16. 00=4% or 3. 5%|   | Instructor Explanation:| You need to make use of the inflation formula for the GDP deflator here and compare results between the two years. For 2005: 100 = [$15 T / Real GDP] x 100 So, Real GDP must equal $15 T. You could also recognize that Real GDP and nominal GDP are the same in the base year.For 2006: 103 = [$16 T / Real GDP] x 100 1. 03 = [$16 T / Real GDP] Real GDP = $16 T / 1. 03 So, Real GDP must equal $15. 534 T. The percentage increase in Real GDP will then be [(15. 53 4 – 15) / 15] x 100 = (0. 534 / 15) x 100 = 3. 56%  Therefore Real GDP increases by 3. 56% between 2005 and 2006. | | | | Points Received:| 19 of 20| | Comments:| | | | | | | 3. | Question: | (TCO F) The consumer price index was 198. 3 in January of 2006, and it was 202. 4 in January of 2007. Therefore, the rate of inflation in 2006 was about ______. | | | Student Answer:|   | 202. -198. 3=4. 1 4. 1/198. 3=. 02067 or 2. 07%|   | Instructor Explanation:| The rate of inflation is the rate of change of the inflation indicator, or more specifically: [(New Price Index – Old Price Index) / (Old Price Index)] x 100 In this case this equals, [(202. 4 – 198. 3) / 198. 3] x 100 = (4. 1 / 198. 3) x 100 = 2. 07% or approximately 2%. | | | | Points Received:| 15 of 15| | Comments:| | | | | | | 4. | Question: | (TCO E) (10 points) As the U. S. dollar appreciates in value relative to the Japanese Yen, what happens to the price of U. S. goods in Japan?What happens to the price of Japanese goods in the U. S.? (10 points) Why would a country (for example China) choose to keep their currency relatively pegged to the U. S. dollar? If the U. S. dollar were to appreciate considerably against most currencies, what would be the effect on Chinese exports to countries other than the U. S.? | | | Student Answer:|   | the price of goods in Japan start going up. the price Japanese goods in US start going down. China keeps its currency pegged in order to sell their goods for a cheaper price in the US and to make the US market dependent on their product. If dollar appreciate it will drag China's currency with it,in other words reducing China' export. |   | Instructor Explanation:| When a country's currency appreciates, it becomes more valuable versus the other currency we're comparing against. So, in this case, it would take fewer dollars  to purchase the same amount of Japanese Yen, U. S. goods become more expensive to Japanese buyers, and Japanese goods be come cheaper to U. S. buyers. A country such as China might choose to peg their currency to the U. S. dollar to keep prices stable for a key  trading partner like the U.S. If the U. S. dollar would appreciate considerably against most  currencies, this would not affect China trade with the U. S. , but  Chinese goods would become more expensive to their other trading partners, and could cause Chinese exports to these other markets to decrease. | | | | Points Received:| 17 of 20| | Comments:| | | | | | | 5. | Question: | (TCO E) Suppose the Indian rupee price of one  British pound is 54. 392 rupees for each pound. A hotel room in London costs 120 pounds, while a similar hotel room in New Delhi costs 6,500 Indian rupees.In which city is the hotel room cheaper, and by how much? | | | Student Answer:|   | London hotel room 120 pound or 6527 rupee (120*54. 392) India hotel room 119. 50 pounds (6500/54. 392) or 6500 rupee the hotel room is cheaper in India for . 50 cent in pound or 27 rupees|   | Instructor Explanation:| Since the exchange rate is 1  pound = 54. 392 Indian rupees, we can convert the price of the hotel room in London to Indian rupees and then be able to compare. 120 pounds = rupees(120 x 54. 392) = 6,527 rupees.Since the hotel room in New Delhi  costs 6,500 rupees, it must be that the hotel room costs 27 rupees  more in London than in New Delhi. | | | | Points Received:| 15 of 15| | Comments:| | | | | | | 6. Question: | (TCO E) Answer the next question on the basis of the following production possibilities data for Egypt and Greece:   Egypt production possibilities: A  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  B  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  C  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  D  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  E Shirts  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚     Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   0  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   3  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  6  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚     Ã‚  9  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  12 Pants  Ã‚     Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   24  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  18  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   12     Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚     6  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  0 Greece production possibilities:A  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  B  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  C  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  D  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  E Shirts  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  40  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  30  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   20  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  10  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   0 Pants  Ã‚     Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   0  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚     Ã‚   40  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   80  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚     Ã‚  120  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚     Ã‚  Ã‚  160 Refer to the above data. What would be feasible terms of trade between Egypt and Greece? | | | Student Answer:|   | terms of trade between 2 countries lie somewhere between the opportunity costs in the 2 countries. in this case Egypt 1 shirt= 2 pants and in Greece case 1 shirt=4 pants, so the only feasible term of trade between the 2 countries would be anywhere in between these limits anything between 2 and 4 shirts and pants would work. t any terms of trade higher or lower than 2 or 4 pants per shirt , one of the countries would be able to do better than the terms of trade simply by trading off resources in their own country. |   | Instructor Explanation:| Feasible terms of trade between 2 countries lie somewhere between the opportunity costs in the 2 countries. In this case, in Egypt —   1 Shirt = 2 Pants, and in Greece — 1 Shirt = 4 Pants. So,  the only feasible terms of trade between the 2 countries would be anywhere in between these limitsà ‚  Ã¢â‚¬â€ anything between 2 and 4 Pants per Shirts would work.At any terms of trade higher or lower than  2 to 4 Pants per Shirts, one of the countries would be able to do better than the terms of trade simply by trading off resources in their own country. | | | | Points Received:| 20 of 20| | Comments:| | | | | | | 7. | Question: | (TCO F) The Republic of Republic produces two goods/services, fish (F) and chips (C). In 2006, the 1000 units of F produced sold for $8 per unit and the 5000 units of C produced sold for $1 per unit. In 2007, the 1500 units of F produced sold for $10 per unit, and the 6,000 units of C produced sold for $2 per unit.Calculate Real GDP for 2007, assuming that 2006 is the base year. | | | Student Answer:|   | base year 2006 1,000 units of fish at 8/unit =8,000 5,000 units of chips at 1/unit =5,000 GDP=13,000 2007 1,500 units of fish at 10/unit-15,000 6,000 units of chips at 2/ units at 2/unit =12000 GDP =27,000 Real GDP with 2006 as the base year 1500 units of fish at 8/unit =12,000 6,000 unit chips at 1/unit = 6,000 Real GDP =18,000 18,000-13,000/18,000 GDP grew by 28%|   | Instructor Explanation:| For 2006, Nomimal GDP  = ($8 x 1000) + ($1 x 5000) = $13,000.Real GDP for 2006 would be the same ($13,000). For 2007, Nominal GDP = ($10 x 1500) + ($2 x 6000) = $27,000. Real GDP for 2007 would be ($8 x 1500) + ($1 x 6000) = $18,000. That is, when calculating real GDP for a given year you use the production numbers for that year and the prices from the base  year. | | | | Points Received:| 12 of 15| | Comments:| | | | | | | 8. | Question: | (TCO F)  Country A  produces two goods,  elephants  and  saddles. In the year  2006, the  10 units of elephants produced sold for $2,000 per unit and the  25 units of  saddles produced sold for $200 per unit.In 2007, the  20 units of  elephants produced sold for $3,000 per unit, and the 50 units of  saddles produced sold for $300 per unit. Real GDP for 2007, assuming that  2006 is the base year, is ______. | | | Student Answer:|   | base year 2006 10 units at 2000 per unit =20,000 25 saddles at 200=5000 GDP=25,000 2007 20 units at 3,000 per unit =6,000 50 saddles at 300=15000 GDP=21,000 real GDP with 2006 as the base year 20 units of elephants at 3000 = 60000 for 50 units of saddles at 25 =1250 real GDP 61250 61250-21000/61250 real GDP grew by 65%.   | Instructor Explanation:| Real GDP is calculated for a given year by using the quantities produced in that year and substituting the base year prices. In this example we get: 20 ($2,000) +  50 ($200) = $40,000 + $10,000 = $50,000. | | | | Points Received:| 12 of 15| | Comments:| | | | | | | 9. | Question: | (TCO E) A Honda Accord sells for $28,000 in the United States and for SF35,520 in Switzerland. Given an exchange rate of SF1. 5 = $1, how do the car prices of both countries compare? | | | Student Answer:|   | with an exchange rate of SF1. 25=$1 28,000*1. 25=35,000 SF price is 35,520 t he car sells for SF520 more in Switzerland that it does in the US. |   | Instructor Explanation:| At an exchange rate of $1 = SF1. 25: $28,000 would equal   (1. 25 x 28,000) Swiss Francs = SF35,000, meaning that the car sells for SF520 more in Switzerland than it does in the U. S. Points 15 of 15| | | | | | |

Thursday, January 9, 2020

Animal Farm by George Orwell - 911 Words

Having too much power can corrupt people. Mr. Jones is the owner of Manor Farm. One day he forgets to feed the animals and they rebel. Then the farm’s name is changed to Animal Farm and it is run by animals and the pigs take leadership. The pigs brainwash the animals into believing what is not true and manipulate the other animals on the farm. In the end the pigs act just like humans. In order to secure a life of luxury for Napoleon and his fellow pigs, Napoleon (with Squealer as his spokesman) uses language that intimidates, language that distorts the truth, and language that appeals to the emotions of the others to manipulate the gullible animals of Animal Farm. Squealer uses language that intimidates the animals. The pigs tell the animals that the apples and milk should be reserved for the pigs only. â€Å"Do you know what would happen if we pigs failed in our duty?† Squealer says they would fail in their duty if they do not get apples and milk, if they fail Jones would come back, so it intimidates them to let the pigs have the apples and milk. Snowball gets expelled and Squealer goes around the farm to explain to the animals that Napoleon is making a great sacrifice in taking the leadership responsibilities. â€Å"Surely, comrades, you do not want Jones back?† If Jones comes back to the farm, the animals would be treated badly again. They are scared of that, and their fear intimidates them to agree and cooperate with the pigs. Squealer looks ill and announces that Napoleon isShow MoreRelatedAnimal Farm And George Orwell By George Orwell1034 Words   |  5 Pages Eric Arthur Blair, under the pseudonym of George Orwell, composed many novels in his lifetime that were considered both politically rebellious and socially incorrect. Working on the dream since childhood, Orwell would finally gain notoriety as an author with his 1945 novel Animal Farm, which drew on personal experiences and deeply rooted fear to satirically critique Russian communism during its expansion. Noticing the impact he made, he next took to writing the novel 1984, which similarly criticizedRead MoreAnimal Farm By George Orwell1397 Words   |  6 PagesAn important quote by the influential author of Animal Farm, George Orwell, is, â€Å"Every line of serious work that I have written since 1936 has been written, directly or indirectly, against totalitarianism.† George Orwell, a Democratic Socialist, wrote the book Animal Farm as an attack on the Communist country of Russia (â€Å"The Political Ideas of George Orwell,† worldsocialism.org). He had a very strong disliking of Communism and the Socialist party of Russia. However, he insisted on finding the truthRead MoreAnimal Farm, By George Orwell1545 Words   |  7 Pagesallow because an this elite institution of people often use this gear to dominate and oppress society. In George Orwell’s story, Animal Farm, Orwell demonstrates that education is a powerful weapon and is a device that can be used to at least one’s benefit. Living in a world where strength is a straightforward to benefit, the pigs quick use education to govern the relaxation of the animals on the farm to serve themselves worked to their advantage. This story in shows the underlying message that   firstRead MoreAnimal Farm By George Orwell944 Words   |  4 Pageslegs(Orwell 132). He carried a whip in his trotter(Orwell 133). In the novel Animal Farm by George Orwell, animals have the ability to talk and form their own ethos, Animalism. Animal Farm is an intriguing allegory by George Orwell, who is also th e author of 1984, includes many enjoyable elements. More knowledge of the author, his use of allegorical elements, themes, symbols, and the significance in the real world, allows the reader to get more out of this glance into the future. George OrwellRead MoreAnimal Farm, By George Orwell876 Words   |  4 Pagesrebellious animals think no man means freedom and happiness, but they need to think again. The animals of Manor Farm rebel against the farm owner, Mr. Jones, and name it Animal Farm. The animals create Animalism, with seven commandments. As everything seems going well, two of the animals get into a rivalry, and things start changing. Food starts disappearing and commandments are changed, and the power begins to shift. Father of dystopian genre, George Orwell writes an interesting allegory, Animal FarmRead MoreAnimal Farm by George Orwell1100 Words   |  4 PagesIntroduction: Widely acknowledged as a powerful allegory, the 1945 novella Animal Farm, conceived from the satirical mind of acclaimed author George Orwell, is a harrowing fable of a fictional dystopia that critiques the socialist philosophy of Stalin in terms of his leadership of the Soviet Union. Tired of their servitude to man, a group of farm animals revolt and establish their own society, only to be betrayed into worse servitude by their leaders, the pigs, whose initial virtuous intentionsRead MoreAnimal Farm By George Orwell1538 Words   |  7 PagesMecca Animal Farm The Russian Revolution in 1917 shows how a desperate society can be turned into a military superpower filled with terror and chaos. George Orwell uses his book, Animal Farm, to parallel this period of time in history. This book is an allegory of fascism and communism and the negative outcomes. The animals begin with great unity, working toward a common goal. The government then becomes corrupted by the temptations of power. George Orwell uses the characters in Animal Farm to showRead MoreAnimal Farm by George Orwell1175 Words   |  5 PagesAn enthusiastic participant in the Spanish civil war in 1936, George Orwell had a great understanding of the political world and made his strong opinions known through his enlightening literary works, many of which are still read in our modern era. Inspired by the 1917 Russian Revolution and the failed society it resulted in, Animal Farm by George Orwell is an encapsulating tale that epitomises how a free utopian society so idealistic can never be accomplished. The novella exemplifies how influencesRead MoreAnimal Farm, By George Orwell1089 Words   |  5 PagesIn George Orwell’s â€Å"Animal Farm†, the pigs as the farm leaders, use unknown language, invoke scare tactics and create specific laws, thereby enabling them to control other animals, to suit their greedy desires, and to perform actions outside their realm of power. Because of the pigs’ use of broad language, and the implementation of these tactics they are able to get away with avoiding laws, and are able to convince other animals into believing untrue stories that are beneficial to the pigs. The firstRead MoreAnimal Farm, By George Orwell1212 Words   |  5 PagesShe stood there over the dead animals thinking to herself what have we come to? We try to become free but we just enslave ourselves to a so called superior kind. Napoleon killed the animals in front of the whole farm and said that this was to be the punishment for the traitors. Snowball was known as a traitor now and anyone conspiring with him would be killed. Snowball and Napoleon both represent historical characters during the Russian revolution in 1917.Snowball who was one of the smartest pigs

Wednesday, January 1, 2020

What Factors Caused The Civil War - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 6 Words: 1749 Downloads: 6 Date added: 2019/05/15 Category History Essay Level High school Tags: Civil War Essay War Essay Did you like this example? Was the Civil War certain, or could it have been evaded? Was slavery the only, or even the primary, cause of the war? Were other factors similar or more significant? The irrepressible conflict argument was the first to dominate historical debate. Henry Wilsons History of the Rise and Fall of the Slave Power (1872â€Å"1877) was a vivid version of this moral explanation of the war, which reasoned that Northerners had fought to preserve the Union and a system of free labor against the hostile proposals of the South. This dispute started even before the war had begun. In 1858, Senator William H. Seward of New York took notice of two challenging accounts of the sectional pressures that were then combusting the nation. He claimed, those who believed the sectional hostility to be accidental, unnecessary, the work of interested or fanatical agitators. In opposing them stood those (like Seward himself) who supposed there to be an irrepressible conflict between opposing and enduring forces. For at least a century, the division Seward defined remained at the heart of scholarly debate. History of the United States from the Compromise of 1850 . . . (1893â€Å"1900) by James Ford Rhodes, identified slavery as the central, indeed virtually the only, cause of the war. If the Negro had not been brought to America, he wrote, the Civil War could not have occurred. Well, it probably would have happened anyways, given that it was also a financial reason, and/or labor system. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "What Factors Caused The Civil War?" essay for you Create order In spite of the fact that James Ford Rhodes put his most noteworthy accentuation on the ethical clash over subjugation, he recommended that the battle likewise mirrored basic contrasts between the Northern and Southern monetary frameworks. During the 1920s, the possibility of the war as an uncontrollable economic, as opposed to moral, clash got more full articulation from Charles and Mary Beard in The Rise of American Civilization (2 vols., 1927). Slavery, the Beards asserted, was less a cultural or social organization as a financial one, a system of labor. There were, they demanded, intrinsic threats between Northern industrialists and Southern growers. The possibility of the war as avoidable increased wide acknowledgment among researchers of history during the 1920s-1930s, when a gathering known as the revisionists offered new records of the birthplaces of the contention. One of the main revisionists was Avery Craven, a main revisionist, put accentuation on the issue of subjugation than had James G. Randall, who found in the social and monetary frameworks of the North and the South no variances so essential as to require a war. Servitude, he proposed, was a basically kindhearted establishment; it was regardless as of now disintegrating within the sight of nineteenth century inclinations. Only the political ineptitude of a thoughtless age of pioneers could represent the Civil War, he asserted. Be that as it may, in The Coming of the Civil War (1942), he too contended that slave workers werent any better off than Northern modern laborers, that the establishment was at that point headed straight toward extreme eradication, and that war could hence have been deflected had apt and mindful leaders attempted to create consensus among themselves. Later defenders of the irrepressible struggle conflict have taken distinctive perspectives of the Northern and Southern positions on the argument however have been similarly stubborn on the job of culture and belief system in making them. Eric Foner, in Free Soil, Free Labor, Free Men (1970) and different works, underscored the significance of the free-work belief system to Northern rivals of servitude. The ethical worries of the abolitionists were not the prevailing assumptions in the North, he guaranteed. Relatively, most Northerners (counting Abraham Lincoln) restricted servitude to a great extent since they dreaded it may spread toward the North and compromise the situation of free white workers. Persuaded that Northern culture was better than that of the South, and progressively convinced of the Souths expectations to broaden the slave control past its current fringes, Northerners were grasping a perspective that made conflict relatively inescapable. Eugene Genovese, composing of Southern slaveholders in The Political Economy of Slavery (1965), accentuated Northerners conviction that the slave framework gave a definitely more altruistic culture than mechanical work, that the South had developed a unique progress based on the connection of Master to slave. Just as Northerners were getting to be persuaded of a Southern risk to their financial framework, so Southerners trusted that the North had forceful and unfriendly plans on the Southern lifestyle. Like Foner, in this way, Genovese found in the social viewpoint of the segment the source of everything except inevitable conflict. Historians who debate that the disagreement emerged naturally, even inescapably, out of a vital discrepancy between the sections, have therefore disagreed distinctly over whether moral, cultural, social, ideological, or economic issues were the primary problems of the Civil War. However, they were in standard accord that the battle between north and south became deeply embedded within the nature of the two societies, that slavery became one way or the other on the heart of the variations, and that the disaster that in the end emerged became irrepressible. Different historians, however, have questioned that assumption and feature argued that the civil conflict could have been avoided, that the differences between north and south have been now not so essential as to have necessitated struggle. like proponents of the irrepressible conflict college, advocates of the battle as a repressible war emerged first within the nineteenth century. President James Buchanan, as an example, believed that extremist agitators had been responsible for the war, and many southerners writing of the warfare inside the late 19th century claimed that only the fanaticism of the republican celebration could account for the struggle. More recent scholars of the war have kept elements of the revisionist understanding alive by stressing the role of political tension and ethnocultural struggles in the rise of the war. In 1960, for example, David Herbert Donald contended that the politicians of the 1850s were not bizarrely inept, but that they were functioning in a civilization in which traditional limits were being battered in the face of the swift extension of democracy. Thus the sober, statesmanlike answer of differences was predominantly difficult. Michael Holt, in The Political Crisis of the 1850s (1978), stressed the role of political parties and particularly the downfall of the second party system, rather than the conflicting differences between sectors, Though, in explaining the conflict, he dodged this placing fault on any other assembly. Holt, however, also helped present another component to the dispute. He was, along with Paul Kleppner, Joel Silbey, and William Gienapp, one of the creators of an ethnocultural interpretation of the war. The Civil War began, the ethnoculturalists argue, in large part because the party system the most operative instrument for containing and facilitating sectional differences fell in the 1850s and formed a new Republican Party that intensified, rather than comforted, the divisions in the nation. But unlike other intellectuals, who saw the argument over slavery as the dominant factor in the collapse of the party system, the ethnoculturalists argue for other factors. For example, William Gienapp, in The Origins of the Republican Party, 1852â€Å"1856 (1987), argued that the crumbling of the party system in the early 1850s was less a result of the debate over slavery in the territories than of such ethnocultural issues as temperance and nativism. The Republican Party itself, he argued, w as less a creation of antislavery fervor than one of constant competition with the Know-Nothing Party over ethnic and cultural matters. Most recently, The United States is as at odds as it has been in decades. Fifty-five percent of Americans think the country is less united today than it was when Trump took office and thirteen percent of Americans have ended a friendship over political issues. Our disunity extends to where we decide to live, with many areas of the country becoming ever more politically homogeneous. While you can question if the country was ever really united, there is little doubt that between significant biased disagreement on fundamental moral issues and our increasing hostility towards members of the other side that the country is in a risky spot. It might not be surprising then that when Rasmussen Polling asked people How likely is that the United States will experience a second civil war sometime in the next five years? thirty-one percent of respondents said they thought it was likely with eleven percent saying it was very likely. In many ways, this belief has the qualities of a self-fulfilling prophecy. If you really think that violence by the other side is imminent you are going to act accordingly. As history shows us, this can often include preemptive acts of violence. Such actions can make the situation spiral out of control in a haste. The mere fact that so many people think another Civil War is a possibility might make the event more likely. On the other hand, things looked a bit more dangerous in the lead up to the Civil War than they do now. Political violence in Kansas over the slavery inquiry lead to open warfare and made national headlines for years before Lincolns election. In 1856, A southern Congressman beat a Northern Senator with a cane on the Senate floor over his protestations to slavery. Two years after that a brawl took place in the House over similar issues. Given that President Trump is in office, you can almost expect history to repeat itself. Its as almost if Trump wants to flaunt his g reed for control and power by starting disunity within our country by violating the constitutional right that, all men are created equal. Only allowing protection for his followers, and letting the rest of America have their Civil War oblivious to the fact that we are puppets on his strings. In closing the Civil War was most definitely a pivotal part of American history nonetheless fought for more reasons than slavery, it was a compass set in time that would lead to todays modern ethical and moral values. Understand the reasons in which it took place, wasnt solely on one component or the other (slavery or for political reasons), the Civil War happened because political figures then couldnt come to a common consensus, and were inhumane in some ways. Most of them wanted to win more than they wanted to solve the primary issue at hand. Morality, a particular system of values and principles of conduct, especially one held by a specified person or society(s). You cant always get what you want, so you try anyways right?